Comments on: What might it mean if Cisco Dumps HP As Certified Partner ? http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/greg/cisco-dumps-hp-certified-partner/ Independent Experts United Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:24:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dave http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/greg/cisco-dumps-hp-certified-partner/comment-page-1/#comment-564 Dave Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:38:30 +0000 http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/greg/cisco-dumps-hp-certified-partner/#comment-564 Greg, great post. I think you did a great job taking a look at this HP/Cisco situation from 30,000 ft. One piece of information that read a little funny to me. It looks to me like you are saying that HP started procurve, then they pruchased 3Com, then Cisco started on servers. However, I was under the impression that Cisco started talking about servers in Jan 2009 and teh HP/3Com buyout didn't happen until Nov 2009? <br><br>I know it's not the biggest deal, but I think it shows the back and forth of HP and Cisco a little more. Rather than HP making a number of moves, then Cisco responding. Greg, great post. I think you did a great job taking a look at this HP/Cisco situation from 30,000 ft. One piece of information that read a little funny to me. It looks to me like you are saying that HP started procurve, then they pruchased 3Com, then Cisco started on servers. However, I was under the impression that Cisco started talking about servers in Jan 2009 and teh HP/3Com buyout didn't happen until Nov 2009?

I know it's not the biggest deal, but I think it shows the back and forth of HP and Cisco a little more. Rather than HP making a number of moves, then Cisco responding.

]]> By: davemartinez http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/greg/cisco-dumps-hp-certified-partner/comment-page-1/#comment-286 davemartinez Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:38:30 +0000 http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/greg/cisco-dumps-hp-certified-partner/#comment-286 Greg, great post. I think you did a great job taking a look at this HP/Cisco situation from 30,000 ft. One piece of information that read a little funny to me. It looks to me like you are saying that HP started procurve, then they pruchased 3Com, then Cisco started on servers. However, I was under the impression that Cisco started talking about servers in Jan 2009 and teh HP/3Com buyout didn't happen until Nov 2009? <br><br>I know it's not the biggest deal, but I think it shows the back and forth of HP and Cisco a little more. Rather than HP making a number of moves, then Cisco responding. Greg, great post. I think you did a great job taking a look at this HP/Cisco situation from 30,000 ft. One piece of information that read a little funny to me. It looks to me like you are saying that HP started procurve, then they pruchased 3Com, then Cisco started on servers. However, I was under the impression that Cisco started talking about servers in Jan 2009 and teh HP/3Com buyout didn't happen until Nov 2009?

I know it's not the biggest deal, but I think it shows the back and forth of HP and Cisco a little more. Rather than HP making a number of moves, then Cisco responding.

]]>