http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/chris/enterprise-computing-the-wide-striping-debate/ Independent Experts United Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:24:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/chris/enterprise-computing-the-wide-striping-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-597 jeremyinnc Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:23:10 +0000 http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=638#comment-597 I think that's only true if your actual RAID groups are all the same size. Since double disk failures require both drives out at the same time if you've got less drives in the RAID set the lower the chance - much lower as you get below 6. I do agree with your post. I think that's only true if your actual RAID groups are all the same size. Since double disk failures require both drives out at the same time if you've got less drives in the RAID set the lower the chance – much lower as you get below 6. I do agree with your post.

]]> http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/chris/enterprise-computing-the-wide-striping-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-194 jeremyinnc Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:23:10 +0000 http://thestoragearchitect.com/?p=638#comment-194 I think that's only true if your actual RAID groups are all the same size. Since double disk failures require both drives out at the same time if you've got less drives in the RAID set the lower the chance - much lower as you get below 6. I do agree with your post. I think that's only true if your actual RAID groups are all the same size. Since double disk failures require both drives out at the same time if you've got less drives in the RAID set the lower the chance – much lower as you get below 6. I do agree with your post.

]]>