<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMC Takes On NetApp For Data Domain&#8217;s Affections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/stephen/emc-takes-netapp-data-domains-affections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/stephen/emc-takes-netapp-data-domains-affections/</link>
	<description>The best independent IT commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:24:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank C. Tannehill</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/stephen/emc-takes-netapp-data-domains-affections/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank C. Tannehill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gestaltit.com/?p=865#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Data Domain was offered 1.8 million dollars at a certain point and they refused. Then came the big 2.1 million offer. I lost interest then and now I have no idea what happened. &lt;br&gt;__________ &lt;br&gt;Frank C. Tannehill &lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.123-reg.co.uk/domain-names/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;domain name&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Data Domain was offered 1.8 million dollars at a certain point and they refused. Then came the big 2.1 million offer. I lost interest then and now I have no idea what happened. <br />__________ <br />Frank C. Tannehill <br /><a href="http://www.123-reg.co.uk/domain-names/" rel="follow"  rel="nofollow">domain name</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3parfarley</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/stephen/emc-takes-netapp-data-domains-affections/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>3parfarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gestaltit.com/?p=865#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the EMC fit makes more sense, unless there is reason to believe that Data Domain&#039;s products are cleaning up in EMC accounts.  Netapp needs this more than EMC because it needs an off-platform product to sell to non-Netapp customers.  Data Domain gives Netapp an entre to the broad market again - and especially into EMC accounts that it can&#039;t get with any other of it&#039;s existing products.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EMC is defending itself against a Netapp Trojan horse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#39;t think the EMC fit makes more sense, unless there is reason to believe that Data Domain&#39;s products are cleaning up in EMC accounts.  Netapp needs this more than EMC because it needs an off-platform product to sell to non-Netapp customers.  Data Domain gives Netapp an entre to the broad market again &#8211; and especially into EMC accounts that it can&#39;t get with any other of it&#39;s existing products.  </p>
<p>EMC is defending itself against a Netapp Trojan horse.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
