<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does VCE vBlock Really Mean Cookie Cutter Architecture For The Cloud?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/does-vce-vblock-really-mean-cookie-cutter-architecture-for-the-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/does-vce-vblock-really-mean-cookie-cutter-architecture-for-the-cloud/</link>
	<description>The best independent IT commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:24:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/does-vce-vblock-really-mean-cookie-cutter-architecture-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4968#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Barry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the info on Terremark&#039;s vCloud Express storage! I wasn&#039;t trying to imply that vCloud Express was EMC on the back end. I really had no idea until now. I guess this could prove that the VCE architecture could be cookie cutter enough that any storage could be snapped in like &quot;legos&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Barry,</p>
<p>Thanks for the info on Terremark&#39;s vCloud Express storage! I wasn&#39;t trying to imply that vCloud Express was EMC on the back end. I really had no idea until now. I guess this could prove that the VCE architecture could be cookie cutter enough that any storage could be snapped in like &#8220;legos&#8221;!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Burke</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/does-vce-vblock-really-mean-cookie-cutter-architecture-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4968#comment-171</guid>
		<description>vCloud Express at Terremark runs on 3PAR storage, not EMC.  Nothing to do with VCE at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->vCloud Express at Terremark runs on 3PAR storage, not EMC.  Nothing to do with VCE at all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
