Up until reading this post by Justin Parisi, I’ll admit I was always a little confused when I saw people write GiB instead of GB. I think I rationalized it as a stylized choice, people trying to be a little extra cute in their writing. Or perhaps it had something to do with the context of presenting that number. Forgive my ignorance, but I didn’t think they were a totally separate measure.
Really what this signifies is a significant difference in how storage is measured, binary vs decimal. Obviously I’m not the only one confused. NetApp recently fixed a bug in ONTAP that displayed binary storage figures with a decimal description.
As Justin points out, make sure you look at what a storage company is actually representing in their capacity figures. Assuming decimal, even if more common, could leave you with significantly less if you’re wrong.
Justin Parisi comments:
What happens when you use decimal vs. binary to measure storage? Well, it can mean that what you thought was 316GB of storage is really only 288GiB – depending on how the vendor has decided to display it.
Read more at: ALL YOUR BASE…
- AMD Plays the Long Hygon | Gestalt IT Rundown: July 11, 2018 - July 12, 2018
- AIRI: Converging FlashBlade into an AI Reference Architecture - July 12, 2018
- 2018 MacBook Pros Comes Closer to Earning Their Name - July 12, 2018
- The Path of an IT Influencer Starts with a Single Post - July 12, 2018
- Leon Adato – IT Origins - July 10, 2018
- John Welsh – IT Origins - July 5, 2018
- Covering All Your Storage Bases - June 28, 2018
- WPA3 Is Certifiable | Gestalt IT Rundown: June 27, 2018 - June 27, 2018
- IT Burnout is Inevitable – The On-Premise IT Roundtable - June 26, 2018
- Oksana Sokolovsky – IT Origins - June 21, 2018