Dan Goodin at Ars Technica gives an overview of the implications of the recently exposed telnet vulnerability disclosed by WikiLeaks. I’m not surprised the CIA had something like that, however morally dubious I may find it. As an intelligence organization it’s in their interest to have this kind of access.
For me, this goes beyond Cisco. There’s basically no workaround, if you can’t disable telnet, there’s no way to fully protect yourself from the vulnerability. Cisco pledged to get a fix out soon, but that doesn’t do a lot of good now. But this portends the potential minefield of security issues we’ll see in the Internet of Things.
Cisco is a giant company with a heavy financial interest to get this patched with all of their engineering talent. Yet even with all their resources, it’s still taking time and was left open for a long time. Now image the raft of connected devices from various distributors. While these represent smaller targets for state or otherwise malicious actors, the odds are that they will be even harder to detect and patch, especially if vendors have no financial stake in doing so.
Ars Technica comments:
- Trends – IT Origins Survey - April 19, 2018
- Qualcomm’s Terrible No Good Very Bad Acquisition | Gestalt IT Rundown: April 18, 2018 - April 18, 2018
- Open Mesh Brings Major Disruption to SMB Space, Goes Full-Stack - April 17, 2018
- BONUS: Karen Lopez – IT Origins - April 17, 2018
- You Can’t Handle the SaaS in Gestalt News 18.14 - April 16, 2018
- Sonia Cuff – IT Origins - April 12, 2018
- Traditional is the New Legacy - April 11, 2018
- The Security Problem of Email Dots - April 10, 2018
- You Should Care Where SaaS Lives | On-Premise IT Roundtable - April 10, 2018
- VPNs Made Easy, Panera Data Breach, and InfiniSync in Gestalt News 18.13 - April 9, 2018