Dan Goodin at Ars Technica gives an overview of the implications of the recently exposed telnet vulnerability disclosed by WikiLeaks. I’m not surprised the CIA had something like that, however morally dubious I may find it. As an intelligence organization it’s in their interest to have this kind of access.
For me, this goes beyond Cisco. There’s basically no workaround, if you can’t disable telnet, there’s no way to fully protect yourself from the vulnerability. Cisco pledged to get a fix out soon, but that doesn’t do a lot of good now. But this portends the potential minefield of security issues we’ll see in the Internet of Things.
Cisco is a giant company with a heavy financial interest to get this patched with all of their engineering talent. Yet even with all their resources, it’s still taking time and was left open for a long time. Now image the raft of connected devices from various distributors. While these represent smaller targets for state or otherwise malicious actors, the odds are that they will be even harder to detect and patch, especially if vendors have no financial stake in doing so.
Ars Technica comments:
- In Defense of Facebook’s “Protect” - February 15, 2018
- Tom Lyon – IT Origins - February 15, 2018
- Do You Want to Build a Cloud? Gestalt IT Rundown: February 14, 2018 - February 14, 2018
- AI and Machines That Think They Can Think - February 14, 2018
- Docker for Home Automation - February 13, 2018
- The Cheapest PC Is Now More Expensive and Worse - February 13, 2018
- What’s Next for Infrastructure in a Post-Meltdown Reality? - February 13, 2018
- The IT Differentiation Dilemma – The On-Premise IT Roundtable - February 13, 2018
- Silent Keyboards, a Talk with Jack Daniel, and Cisco LIVES in Gestalt News 18.7 - February 12, 2018
- The Sound of Silence: MX Board Silent Review - February 12, 2018