<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wire-Speed 10 Gb iSCSI, Anyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/wirespeed-10-gb-iscsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/wirespeed-10-gb-iscsi/</link>
	<description>Independent Experts United</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: FCoE vs. iSCSI: The Cagefight! &#8211; Performance &#171; J Metz&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/wirespeed-10-gb-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>FCoE vs. iSCSI: The Cagefight! &#8211; Performance &#171; J Metz&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gestaltit.com/?p=391#comment-346</guid>
		<description>[...] Nevertheless, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that iSCSI performance is impressive. In February Frank Berry wrote an article about how Intel and Microsoft are tweaking iSCSI for enterprise applications, improving CPU efficiency as well as blasting through some very impressive IOPS numbers. Steven Foskett has a very interesting article on on how it was done and rightfully asks the more important question, can your storage handle the truth? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nevertheless, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that iSCSI performance is impressive. In February Frank Berry wrote an article about how Intel and Microsoft are tweaking iSCSI for enterprise applications, improving CPU efficiency as well as blasting through some very impressive IOPS numbers. Steven Foskett has a very interesting article on on how it was done and rightfully asks the more important question, can your storage handle the truth? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft and Intel Push One Million iSCSI IOPS &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/wirespeed-10-gb-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft and Intel Push One Million iSCSI IOPS &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gestaltit.com/?p=391#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] March, Microsoft and Intel demonstrated that the combination of Windows Server 2008 R2 and the Xeon 5500 could saturate a 10 GbE, pushing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] March, Microsoft and Intel demonstrated that the combination of Windows Server 2008 R2 and the Xeon 5500 could saturate a 10 GbE, pushing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft and Intel Pushing iSCSI Performance Limits &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/wirespeed-10-gb-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft and Intel Pushing iSCSI Performance Limits &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gestaltit.com/?p=391#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] is simply not the case. The fastest SAN I ever saw was based on iSCSI, and Microsoft demonstrated wire-speed iSCSI over 10 Gb Ethernet in March. I never saw a Fibre Channel SAN (even an 8 Gb/s one) push over a gigabyte per second over a single [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is simply not the case. The fastest SAN I ever saw was based on iSCSI, and Microsoft demonstrated wire-speed iSCSI over 10 Gb Ethernet in March. I never saw a Fibre Channel SAN (even an 8 Gb/s one) push over a gigabyte per second over a single [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/wirespeed-10-gb-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gestaltit.com/?p=391#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Axstor has been shipping 10Gb for more than 2 years in the form of the Axstor Ai-4000 and the Axstor Ai-5000 series iSCSI arrays and has been able to sustain more than 1,160 MB/s from a single 10Gb port using IOmeter when testing sequential reads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Axstor has been shipping 10Gb for more than 2 years in the form of the Axstor Ai-4000 and the Axstor Ai-5000 series iSCSI arrays and has been able to sustain more than 1,160 MB/s from a single 10Gb port using IOmeter when testing sequential reads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/stephen/wirespeed-10-gb-iscsi/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gestaltit.com/?p=391#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Axstor has been shipping 10Gb for more than 2 years in the form of the Axstor Ai-4000 and the Axstor Ai-5000 series iSCSI arrays and has been able to sustain more than 1,160 MB/s from a single 10Gb port using IOmeter when testing sequential reads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Axstor has been shipping 10Gb for more than 2 years in the form of the Axstor Ai-4000 and the Axstor Ai-5000 series iSCSI arrays and has been able to sustain more than 1,160 MB/s from a single 10Gb port using IOmeter when testing sequential reads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

