<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Gestalt IT &#187; site recovery manager Archives  &#8211; Gestalt IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gestaltit.com/tag/site-recovery-manager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gestaltit.com</link>
	<description>Independent Experts United</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0" -->
	<itunes:summary>Gestalt IT is a community of independent IT infrastructure experts. We gather at GestaltIT.com and our Tech FIeld Day events to discuss the topics of the day. This podcast includes video and audio recordings of these discussions.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Stephen Foskett</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://gestaltit.com/wp-content/uploads/powerpress/Gestalt_IT_Tech_Field_Day_Roundtable_Podcast_600.png" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Stephen Foskett</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>stephen@fosketts.net</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>stephen@fosketts.net (Stephen Foskett)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>The best independent IT commentary</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Storage, Virtualization, Networking, IT</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Technology" />
	<itunes:category text="Business" />
	<itunes:category text="Technology">
		<itunes:category text="Tech News" />
	</itunes:category>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>Future vCenter And SRM Requirement For 64 bit OS Means More vCenter VMs</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/future-vcenter-srm-requirement-64-bit-os-means-vcenter-vms/</link>
		<comments>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/future-vcenter-srm-requirement-64-bit-os-means-vcenter-vms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Brambley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gestaltit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site recovery manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqlpass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtualCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/06/23/future-vcenter-and-srm-requirement-for-64-bit-os-means-more-vcenter-vms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new operating system (OS) requirements mean we will see even more instances of vCenter as a VM (virtual machine).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware engineer Michael White’s post <a href="http://blogs.vmware.com/uptime/2010/06/64-bit-is-almost-here-are-you-ready.html" >64 bit is almost here – are you ready?</a> on the <a href="http://blogs.vmware.com/uptime/" >Uptime (VMware and Business Continuity)</a> Blog foretells of the future 64 bit requirement of both vCenter and SRM (Site Recovery Manager). White writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I wanted to remind everyone, of what I have already seen floating around the internet, but still important enough to remind.  Our next release of SRM is going to require a 64 bit OS.  This is the same as our next release of VC as it too will require a 64 bit host OS.  This change is required to support the increased capabilities of our products.  As we scale our products to match our customers needs, generally 1 – 2 years in advance of where they will need all the capabilities of a given product we have had to use a 64 bit OS.  This will show itself in increased numbers in things like more simultaneous vSphere client connections.”</p></blockquote>
<p>To me <strong>these new operating system (OS) requirements mean we will see even more instances of vCenter as a VM </strong>(virtual machine). It only seems logical that a least path of resistance is to virtualize the management server in order to upgrade, especially considering all have already invested in 64 bit hardware for their hypervisors if they decided to upgrade to vSphere 4 in the first place. To go a step further, I’m willing to argue that it will be more common for an IT Department to justify the cost of additional ESX hosts, even if only dedicated for management, then it will to deploy new servers for physical instances of vCenter.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boche.net/blog/index.php/2010/06/17/esx-and-the-service-console-are-going-away/" >The looming transition</a> to a console-less <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/esx/" class="zem_slink" title="VMware ESX" rel="homepage" >ESXi</a> eventually means <a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/simon/vma-esxi-syslog-server/" >more management virtual appliances</a> in the future too. <a href="http://searchvmware.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid179_gci1509899,00.html" >Solutions which will continue to need a ESX console or similar</a> will have to substitute <a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20007545-92.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" >their own appliance to operate with ESXi</a>. This means even more justification for additional ESX/ESXi hosts and thus greases the decision to virtualize vCenter as well. I expect to see management clusters of ESX hosts become more common in the future than even the use of management networks today.   ESX hosts have bigger and badder hardware now than ever before allowing for higher consolidation ratios and larger applications to easily run in virtual machines, but it will be interesting to see if the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi3_vc_in_vm.pdf" >vCenter as a VM best practices</a> change over time. I personally feel that continuing to separate the database from the virtualized vCenter will continue to be a smart choice. Running a separate, and even virtualized, SQL instance ensures not only better performance of vCenter as a VM but enhances DR scenarios. In fact, those that already have the vCenter database on a remote instance will likely have a safer upgrade to the 64 bit vCenter.  The new 64 bit requirements will no doubt make for an interesting migration scenario, and I’m sure we will see some positive and negative opinions. Let me know your thoughts on a 64 bit vCenter as a VM in the future!</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/rich/design-vcenter-vnetwork-distributed-switch/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Design Challenges Of Virtualized vCenter With A vNetwork Distributed Switch</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/simon/vmware-vcenter-4-minimum-ram-requirement-is-it-2gb-or-3gb/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">VMware vCenter 4 minimum RAM requirement, is it 2GB or 3GB?</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/storage/edsai/scalability-cloud/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Scalability in the cloud</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/security/rich/active-directory-integration-vsphere/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Likewise Agreement Means Active Directory Integration In Future vSphere Versions</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/simon/3par-management-plug-in-for-vmware-vcenter-17/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">3PAR Management Plug-In For VMware vCenter</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/future-vcenter-srm-requirement-64-bit-os-means-vcenter-vms/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© Rich for <a href="http://gestaltit.com">Gestalt IT</a>, 2010. |
<a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/future-vcenter-srm-requirement-64-bit-os-means-vcenter-vms/">Future vCenter And SRM Requirement For 64 bit OS Means More vCenter VMs</a>
<br/>
Read more posts categorized as <a href="http://gestaltit.com/category/all/tech/virtualization/" title="View all posts in Server Virtualization" rel="category tag">Server Virtualization</a><br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/future-vcenter-srm-requirement-64-bit-os-means-vcenter-vms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take VMware SRM Survey, Get a Free Copy of Laverick’s Book, and Donate $10 to UNICEF</title>
		<link>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/rich/vmware-srm-survey-free-laverick-book-unicef/</link>
		<comments>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/rich/vmware-srm-survey-free-laverick-book-unicef/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Brambley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Laverick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site recovery manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqlpass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware needs feedback from SRM (Site Recovery Manager) customers. The SRM product team is asking that customers take a 15 minute survey about their deployments. In return, the first 1000 to participate will receive a free PDF copy of Mike Laverick’s SRM 4.0 book, and VMware will donate $10 to charity. Laverick indicated in an email the chosen charity is UNICEF.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware needs feedback from SRM (<a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/site-recovery-manager/" >Site Recovery Manager</a>) customers. The SRM product team is asking that customers take a 15 minute survey about their deployments. In return, the first 1000 to participate will receive a free PDF copy of <a href="http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/" class="zem_slink" title="Mike Laverick" rel="blog" >Mike Laverick</a>’s SRM 4.0 book, and VMware will donate $10 to charity. Laverick indicated in an email the chosen charity is <a href="http://www.unicef.org/" class="zem_slink" title="UNICEF" rel="homepage" >UNICEF</a>.</p>
<p>Here’s the <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/270234" >VMware Communities: Survey for SRM customers – please …</a> original post from May 27:</p>
<p><script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<blockquote><p>Hello SRM users,  The VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager (SRM) product team is looking for product feedback on SRM deployments. If you have purchased SRM, we would like to hear from you. Your participation will be very valuable to us and the information you provide will be used to improve the SRM product going forward.  You can provide your feedback by <a href="http://app.connect.vmware.com/e/er.aspx?s=524&amp;lid=10394&amp;elq=25e9db5695124dd9b943212b835b4599" >completing the survey</a> The survey should take no longer than 15 minutes and will expire on June 10, 2010. Please note that this survey is for SRM customers only.  Upon completion of the survey, if you are among the 1st 1000 respondents, VMware will donate $10 per response to charity. You will also receive a link to download the electronic copy of Mike Laverick’s book &#8220;<a href="http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/administering-vmware-site-recovery-manager-40/6522402" >Administering VMware Site Recovery Manager 4.0</a>&#8221; upon completion of the survey.  We appreciate you taking the time to provide us with your valuable feedback.  Thank you,  The VMware SRM Team</p></blockquote>
<p>Check out Laverick’s post on this survey as well:  <a href="http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2010/05/28/srm-customer-complete-this-survey-and-vmware-will-donate-10-to-unicef/" >SRM Customer? Complete this survey, and VMware will donate $10 to UNICEF</a></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>You might also want to read these other posts...</h3><ul><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/stephen/metageek-ekahau-wifi-analysis/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">MetaGeek and Ekahau: Wi-Fi Analysis To Go</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/networking/greg/unplugged-show-2-virtual-access-points/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Unplugged – Show 2 – Virtual Access Points</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/rich/implementing-vmware-srm-pay-attention-to-that-man-behind-the-curtain/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Implementing VMware SRM: Pay Attention to that Man Behind the Curtain</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/help-evaluating-vmware-virtual-machine-backup-options/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Help Evaluating VMware Virtual Machine Backup Options</a></li><li><a href="http://gestaltit.com/all/tech/virtualization/rich/future-vcenter-srm-requirement-64-bit-os-means-vcenter-vms/"  rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Future vCenter And SRM Requirement For 64 bit OS Means More vCenter VMs</a></li></ul></div><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sfoskett?i=http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/rich/vmware-srm-survey-free-laverick-book-unicef/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><hr />
<p><small>© Rich for <a href="http://gestaltit.com">Gestalt IT</a>, 2010. |
<a href="http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/rich/vmware-srm-survey-free-laverick-book-unicef/">Take VMware SRM Survey, Get a Free Copy of Laverick’s Book, and Donate $10 to UNICEF</a>
<br/>
Read more posts categorized as <a href="http://gestaltit.com/category/featured/" title="View all posts in Featured" rel="category tag">Featured</a>, <a href="http://gestaltit.com/category/all/tech/virtualization/" title="View all posts in Server Virtualization" rel="category tag">Server Virtualization</a>, <a href="http://gestaltit.com/category/featured/top/" title="View all posts in Top Story" rel="category tag">Top Story</a><br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gestaltit.com/featured/top/rich/vmware-srm-survey-free-laverick-book-unicef/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

