[T]he machines are only as perfect as the humans that program them.
That’s Thomas LaRock’s takeaway after surveying the landscape of AI and finding that SkyNet is a long way off. But inside that puckish premise is a really great discussion of AI, situating it within a specific definition, and breaking down some of the components of AI: Machine Learning and Deep Learning.
With these tools, we’re able to hand off a tremendous amount of work that would otherwise be done by humans. But ultimately, despite rapid advancement, all of these techniques are dependent on input. For now, that’s largely a job for us simple humans.
The whole piece is definitely worth a read if you’re trying to get up to date on the terminology.
Read more at: Why I’m Not Worried About Skynet
- The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our machines… - November 26, 2018
- ProtonMail Was Probably Not Hacked - November 16, 2018
- Goodbye X-IO, Hello Axellio and Violin 2.0! - November 12, 2018
- The New iPad Pro Proves That Apple Doesn’t Need Intel or AMD Anymore - November 9, 2018
- NetApp: HCI Stands For “Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure” - November 6, 2018
- NetApp’s Data Fabric Gets Real - October 31, 2018
- Pondering Red Hat’s Future with IBM - October 30, 2018
- Smaller Conferences Can Have a Bigger Impact - October 29, 2018
- Introducing Ken Nalbone, Cloud Field Day Event Lead - October 5, 2018
- Quantum Computing and Cryptography - September 14, 2018