John Herbert of Lame Journal writes:
In my last post I discussed the problems with managing configurations from multiple vendors, both from the perspective of parsing the configurations for my own nefarious purposes and that of configuring those network devices. The aim would be to configure the network devices using an abstracted (descriptive) configuration — that is, something describing what we want to configure rather than how to configure it on a particular platform, and letting an underlying layer convert that into an actual implementation, much in the same way that Puppet describes what you want to have happen, but it’s up to the Puppet Agent to figure out how to make that happen on a specific platform.
John has some great thoughts about Tail-f and their Networking Field Day 7 presentation.
Read more: Configuration Management the Tail-f NCS Way
- Linksys and the Resurgence of the SMB - May 8, 2017
- Review – Docker Networking Cookbook - February 13, 2017
- The Future of SD-WAN Is Now! - January 10, 2017
- How Kindred Healthcare Uses SD-WAN to Secure Patient Data - December 2, 2016
- The Power of ONUG And What It Means To You - November 30, 2016
- Enabling The Most Remote Offices With Viptela - November 4, 2016
- ONUG Day 2 Wrap Up – Thoughts on Monitoring 2.0 - October 26, 2016
- ONUG Day 1 Wrap Up: SD-WAN In The Spotlight - October 25, 2016
- ONUG Live Blog – Day 1 - October 24, 2016
- Demystifying Docker overlay networking - October 21, 2016