I knew I had reached a new level of geekiness when I realized that seeing competing file system benchmarks excites me.
In this post, Andre Leibovici is comparing XFS and EXT4 on Oracle, running each against the Silly Little Oracle Benchmark (SLOB). He kept the file systems running on defaults, and server, VM configuration, hypervisor, and just about everything else the same.
Overall his tests found that XFS performed better on reads, writes, and CPU utilization. Be sure to check out his post to dig into the graphs and methodology.
Andre Leibovici comments:
My past few blog posts have all been on Oracle and SLOB (Silly Little Oracle Benchmark) create by Kevin Closson. As part of a number of runs with SLOB, I also was curious to benchmark EXT4 and XFS…
Read more at: myvirtualcloud.net EXT4 vs XFS for Oracle, which one performs better?
- Gestalt News for the Week of April 22, 2019 - April 22, 2019
- Patent Peace in Our Time | Gestalt IT Rundown: April 17, 2019 - April 17, 2019
- The Cloud is Going to Disappear – The On-Premise IT Roundtable - April 16, 2019
- Gestalt News for the Week of April 15, 2019 - April 15, 2019
- Run, Google Cloud Run | Gestalt IT Rundown: April 10, 2019 - April 10, 2019
- Gestalt News for the Week of April 8, 2019 - April 8, 2019
- Intel Announces All The Things | Gestalt IT Rundown: April 3, 2019 - April 3, 2019
- Network Analytics Is Too Expensive – The On-Premise IT Roundtable - April 2, 2019
- Pwn2Asus | Gestalt IT Rundown: March 27, 2019 - March 27, 2019
- Gestalt News for the Week of March 25, 2019 - March 25, 2019