Dan Goodin at Ars Technica gives an overview of the implications of the recently exposed telnet vulnerability disclosed by WikiLeaks. I’m not surprised the CIA had something like that, however morally dubious I may find it. As an intelligence organization it’s in their interest to have this kind of access.
For me, this goes beyond Cisco. There’s basically no workaround, if you can’t disable telnet, there’s no way to fully protect yourself from the vulnerability. Cisco pledged to get a fix out soon, but that doesn’t do a lot of good now. But this portends the potential minefield of security issues we’ll see in the Internet of Things.
Cisco is a giant company with a heavy financial interest to get this patched with all of their engineering talent. Yet even with all their resources, it’s still taking time and was left open for a long time. Now image the raft of connected devices from various distributors. While these represent smaller targets for state or otherwise malicious actors, the odds are that they will be even harder to detect and patch, especially if vendors have no financial stake in doing so.
Ars Technica comments:
- Is Open-Source Licensing Broken? | Gestalt IT Rundown: January 22, 2020 - January 22, 2020
- Veeam Acquired by Insight Partners | Gestalt IT Rundown: January 15, 2020 - January 15, 2020
- Wi-Fi Monetization is Bad – The On-Premise IT Roundtable - January 14, 2020
- AI Patent Trolls | Gestalt IT Rundown: January 8, 2019 - January 8, 2020
- IT Certifications Are More Valuable Than A College Degree – The On-Premise IT Roundtable - December 24, 2019
- Predictions for 2020 - December 19, 2019
- 2019 in Review | Gestalt IT Rundown: December 18, 2019 - December 18, 2019
- The Promise of the Cloud Cannot Be Achieved – The On-Premise IT Roundtable - December 17, 2019
- India’s New Data Regulation Bill | Gestalt IT Rundown: December 11, 2019 - December 11, 2019
- Gestalt News for the Week of December 9, 2019 - December 9, 2019